Why square root of a complex number is never purely imaginary?

Assume there is a complex number whose square root is purely imaginary.
$$\sqrt{a+ib} = ic$$
Squaring both sides,
$$a+ib = (ic)^2 = -c^2$$ The RHS is a real number, whereas the LHS is a complex number.
The derived equation is false. Therefore, our original assumption that there can be a complex number whose square root is purely imaginary is false.

Comments

Factorials, and the Gamma Function

What is the Gamma function? What does it have to do with the factorial of a number? And why does such a formula even work? The Factorial In our high school combinatorics course, we were introduced to the factorial of a natural number. We defined the factorial of a number $n$ to be the product of all the natural numbers till $n$. Or symbolically: $$n! = 1 . 2 . 3 ... (n-2) (n-1) n$$ This is a very useful function in Counting problems. This function also pops up in the exponential function: $$e^x = 1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^3}{3!}+...$$ Setting this aside, we think: can we 'extend' this function to all real number? Surely, even if we were to come up with such a function, what would it mean to take this new 'factorial' of some real number? Well, let's take a look at one important property of the factorial function: $$n! = n(n-1)!$$ and this is true for all natural numbers $n$. So, even if we came up with this homologous function, we...

The $\operatorname{erf}$ function

Can a function be 'defined' as the anti-derivative of another function? $\operatorname{erf}$ is one such function. Even though it has various proper infinite series expansions (as in Wolfram MathWorld - Erf ), it is defined by mathematicians as such: $$\operatorname{erf}(z) \equiv \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^ze^{-t^2}dt$$ This function has extensive implications in statistics, and can be used to express the integral of $e^{-x^2}$ and $e^{x^2}$. See the post that tries to find integral of $e^{x^2}$ - we need not use integration by parts there, but rather can use the $\operatorname{erf}$ function. Source: Wolfram MathWorld

Why does integration give the area under the curve?

The definite integral between two points $a$ and $b$ gives the area under the curve for the function between $a$ and $b$, textbooks say. A question arises - how? I had this doubt when I started to learn calculus in my school. And I decided to set out to prove it. Consider a function $\operatorname{f}$, and its derivative $\operatorname{f'}$. We have to prove that $\int_a^b \operatorname{f'}(x) = $ Area under the curve for $\operatorname{f'}(x)$ between $a$ and $b$ Let Area under the curve for $\operatorname{f'}(x)$ between $a$ and $b$ = $S$ Divide the shaded region into parts of very very small width $\delta \to 0$. Each part can be considered as a rectangle of width $\delta$ and height $\operatorname{f'}(c)$ where $c$ is the $x$ coordinate of the graph, $a\le c\le b$. $$\therefore S = \lim_{\delta \to 0}\Bigl(\delta \times \operatorname{f'}(a) + \delta \times \operatorname{f'}(a+\delta) + \delta \times \operatorname{f'}(a+2\delta) +...\\+ \...

Mathematics Compilations

Search This Blog