Skip to main content

Problems that deceive you #1

Let us look at one of the most easiest problems in calculus
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{4\sin^2\frac{x}{2}-4\sin\frac{x}{2}+1}\; dx$$
Seems pretty simple and straightforward, doesn't it? Inside the square root, the expression evaluates to $(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1)^2$, and thus the integral will be
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)dx$$
This then can be evaluated by the following:
$$\biggl[-4\cos\frac{x}{2} -x\biggr]_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}$$
Hold on for the surprise...

Its wrong!


What seemed like a really straightforward and easy problem, is designed in such a way to appear easy so that we approach the wrong way.

Why is the approach wrong?

We did not consider the fact that a simple square root symbol represents its principal square root i.e., the positive square root. That means each and every value the expression inside the original integral evaluates to a positive quantity. But that is not the case when we simplified the integral to 
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)dx$$
In the above integral, the expression inside can also evaluate to a negative quantity, precisely when $\sin \frac{x}{2} \lt \frac{1}{2}$. So we must find an another way out of this.

The correct approach

The original integral evaluates to 
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)^2}\; dx$$
This can be split as 
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{6}}\sqrt{\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)^2}+\int_{\frac{\pi}{6}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)^2}\; dx$$
When we are cancelling out the square roots, we must be sure to make the outside expression positive. We all know that
$$1-2\sin\frac{x}{2}\ge 0, x\in \Bigl[0, \frac{\pi}{6}\Bigr]$$
$$2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\ge 0, x\in \Bigl[\frac{\pi}{6}, \frac{\pi}{2}\Bigr]$$
Applying the above formulae in the split integral, we obtain
$$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{6}}\Bigl(1-2\sin\frac{x}{2}\Bigr)+\int_{\frac{\pi}{6}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\Bigl(2\sin\frac{x}{2}-1\Bigr)\; dx$$
which then can be evaluated into a value.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Factorials, and the Gamma Function

What is the Gamma function? What does it have to do with the factorial of a number? And why does such a formula even work? The Factorial In our high school combinatorics course, we were introduced to the factorial of a natural number. We defined the factorial of a number $n$ to be the product of all the natural numbers till $n$. Or symbolically: $$n! = 1 . 2 . 3 ... (n-2)  (n-1)  n$$ This is a very useful function in Counting problems. This function also pops up in the exponential function: $$e^x = 1+\frac{x}{1!}+\frac{x^2}{2!}+\frac{x^3}{3!}+...$$ Setting this aside, we think: can we 'extend' this function to all real number? Surely, even if we were to come up with such a function, what would it mean to take this new 'factorial' of some real number? Well, let's take a look at one important property of the factorial function: $$n! = n(n-1)!$$ and this is true for all natural numbers $n$. So, even if we came up with this homologous function, we...
Post a Comment
Read more

The $\operatorname{erf}$ function

Can a function be 'defined' as the anti-derivative of another function? $\operatorname{erf}$ is one such function. Even though it has various proper infinite series expansions (as in Wolfram MathWorld - Erf ), it is defined by mathematicians as such: $$\operatorname{erf}(z) \equiv \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^ze^{-t^2}dt$$ This function has extensive implications in statistics, and can be used to express the integral of $e^{-x^2}$ and $e^{x^2}$. See the post that tries to find  integral of $e^{x^2}$  - we need not use integration by parts there, but rather can use the $\operatorname{erf}$ function. Source: Wolfram MathWorld
Post a Comment
Read more

Why $y^2 = x^3 + 7$ has no integral solutions?

Consider the given equation... $$y^2-7=x^3=(x^{\frac{3}{2}})^2$$ $$y^2-(x^{\frac{3}{2}})^2=7$$ If $x^{\frac{3}{2}}$ is a decimal, then $y$ should also be some decimal to make the equation an integer, i.e., $7$. So $y$ will be a decimal in this case. But consider when $x^{\frac{3}{2}}$ is an integer. The only integers whose difference of squares is $7$, is $4$ and $3$ (why?). $$4^2 - 3^2 =7$$ But compare it to the equation $y^2-(x^{\frac{3}{2}})^2=7$. Then $$x^{\frac{3}{2}} = 3$$ $$x = 3^{\frac{2}{3}}$$ But here $x$ is a decimal! Therefore, at least one of the variables $x$ and $y$ is a decimal in the given equation, thus proving the fact that it has no integral solutions.
Post a Comment
Read more